برچسب: Court

  • FTX Seeks Court Approval to Freeze Payouts in China, Russia, and O…

    FTX Seeks Court Approval to Freeze Payouts in China, Russia, and O…


    The FTX estate filed a motion on July 2, 2025, with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, asking to pause crypto payouts to creditors in restricted countries. The motion stated that legal risks tied to digital asset regulations in certain jurisdictions could lead to violations, penalties, or criminal charges.

    The motion aims to let the FTX Recovery Trust freeze distributions in 49 countries where crypto rules are unclear or restrictive. These include China, Russia, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Ukraine. The filing explained that sending crypto payouts to these places might breach local laws.

    “Distributions made by or on behalf of the FTX Recovery Trust into jurisdictions in violation of these legal restrictions may trigger fines and penalties, including personal liability for directors and officers, and/or criminal penalties up to and including imprisonment,”

    the motion read.

    The court filing, published by Kroll, outlines the risks connected to foreign crypto laws and their effect on ongoing FTX bankruptcy distributions.

    China’s Share Reaches 82% of Affected Claims

    The FTX estate highlighted that China accounts for 82% of the value of all creditor claims from restricted countries. These claims face delays as the estate seeks legal clarity on whether payouts to China can proceed.

    – Advertisement –

    In the filing, the estate referenced crypto rules in Macau, where mainland Chinese authorities prohibit financial and non-bank institutions from supporting any crypto transactions. The same approach applies in Mainland China, where crypto trading is banned, though holding digital assets is not clearly outlawed.

    FTX China Payout Freeze Reaction. Source: X (@zhetengji)
                 FTX China Payout Freeze Reaction. Source: X (@zhetengji)

    Neighboring Hong Kong, however, has allowed crypto ETFs and other products, creating a different legal landscape. The estate did not include Hong Kong in the restricted countries list.

    The estate said that all the restricted countries on the list share similar limitations or uncertainty about digital asset regulations. As a result, the FTX Recovery Trust needs court approval to pause payouts in those regions.

    The FTX estate clarified that it is not permanently canceling payouts to FTX creditors in restricted countries. The distributions are on hold while legal teams review compliance with local laws.

    “To provide clarity to the FTX Recovery Trust and its stakeholders alike, the FTX Recovery Trust has developed the restricted jurisdiction procedures to provide notice and a process for resolving the question of whether distributions will be made pursuant to the plan,”

    the motion stated.

    The estate wants the court to approve these procedures to protect the trust and its members from legal risks. The process allows the estate to evaluate if crypto payouts violate local bans or restrictions on digital assets.

    In regions where laws remain unclear, the estate may need to delay payouts longer. However, where permitted, the trust may resume distributions as more legal information becomes available.

    – Advertisement –

    The list of restricted countries includes those with active bans on crypto trading, unclear legal frameworks, or limitations on cross-border crypto flows. The FTX Recovery Trust will use the procedures to determine payout status for each country listed.

    Aaron Brogan, a U.S. bankruptcy lawyer and managing attorney at Brogan Law, addressed the matter in a public comment. He said:

    “When it comes to token distributions in bankruptcy, there is still significant legal uncertainty, and it doesn’t surprise me that the FTX estate might not make distributions in countries where such distributions might be illegal.”

    Brogan’s statement reflects the challenges involved in navigating international digital asset regulations during bankruptcy. The motion to freeze distributions aims to follow the court-approved bankruptcy plan without triggering penalties in restricted countries.

    The court has not yet ruled on the motion. Until then, the FTX Recovery Trust continues to hold back distributions linked to countries listed in the July 2 filing.



    Source link

  • Brussels Court Jails Kidnappers in High-Profile Crypto Case

    Brussels Court Jails Kidnappers in High-Profile Crypto Case


    • Brussels court jails three men for kidnapping crypto investor’s wife.
    • Stephane Winkel’s family forced to move after a traumatic crypto abduction.
    • Tough sentences send a warning as crypto crime risks gain the spotlight.

    A high-profile crypto kidnapping case in Belgium has ended with strong prison sentences for three men. On Thursday, a Brussels criminal court sentenced the trio to 12 years each for the abduction of the wife of blockchain investor Stephane Winkel. This outrageous case is not the only one that demonstrates how crypto wealth can lure dangerous criminals in Europe.

    Crypto Educator Winkel Forced to Relocate After Kidnapping Ordeal

    The kidnapping occurred in December 2024 at the outside of the house of Winkel. Prosecutors told the court that the three men kidnapped the wife of Winkel and took her to a van with French plates. Then they raced along to the seaside. Winkel, a well-known player in the crypto scene, immediately called the police. The local police officers did not hesitate and pushed the van out of the road in Bruges. The three men were arrested inside by officers. There is a juvenile offender who is also charged in juvenile court and is a teenager who was suspected of having participated in the plan.

    Winkel does not represent an ordinary investor. He is the owner of the Crypto Academie and crypto sun whereby people can be educated about cryptocurrency. He owns a YouTube channel as well and has about 40,000 subscribers. That is where he provides free training and advice on crypto investment. Most people know his name due to his work in the public.

    The court did not acknowledge the argument of the kidnappers that they were compelled to do it. According to them, they were being threatened, and the judges did not buy this justification. The court also said that the chief perpetrators of the crime may remain on the loose. Nonetheless, the stiff sentencing is a strong message that such crimes cannot be condoned.

    Unfortunately, the kidnapping had a huge impact on Winkel and his family. It is reported that they were shaken so much that they had to relocate to defend themselves. In the case of Winkel, what would have become an ordinary day in the month of December became a nightmare that could have been worse.

    Brussels Court Sends Tough Message on Rising Crypto Crimes

    This crime is not an isolated event. Europe, and France in particular, has seen more kidnappings connected to crypto wealth. For example, in Juvisy-sur-Orge, a TikTok star aged 26 was kidnapped by four men outside Paris. They had a request of 50,000 in crypto. They released him when they understood that his crypto wallet did not have money.

    Other ones are even more violent. The father of a rich crypto investor was kidnapped and mutilated because the criminals needed 7 million euros in ransom. There was also the daughter of the CEO of a Paris crypto exchange named Paymium. She was being grabbed by the attackers, but the passers-by and her partner succeeded in halting the attackers in time.

    France has documented the most instances of confirmed crypto kidnappings—six compared to the 22 known kidnappings in the world last year. According to experts, this means that criminals have ready targets due to the combination of big names in crypto investing and active public social media posts.

    The Brussels court emphasized that such crimes should be severely punished as a lesson to others. Investors in crypto all over are discovering that becoming public might deliver risks that they do not want. Most end up employing bodyguards or concealing their affluence.

    The sentences can bring some justice to Stephane Winkel and his family. However, the fact that they were scared is now a lesson that the crypto industry can be associated with actual risks and dangers.



    Source link